Multinational Corporation Now and Then Research Paper

Multinational Corporation Now and Then - Research Paper modelA virtual squad is therefore hard to manage because it sorts out things on its own. In fact, what is deemed as pivotal here is to have a meliorate know-how of the headquarters which is leading the virtual team in the first place. The results have to be drawn up in such a way that there is a win-win relationship for both these parties. From an economic stance, it means that the funds are being allocated in the even off direction as far as ground the team progress realms are concerned. This is an important consideration because the economic implications suggest a great deal, and more so within the aegis of the MNCs today and in the times to come (Patnaik, 2011). Within the political sphere, this would mean that the team progress is being supervised by the most appropriate people doable. It will diagnose sure that the concerned authorities would know beforehand how to get the job done and then measure and monitor the p rogress accordingly. This is something that decides the basis of the MNCs in the shew day and age and it will get more competitive in the times to follow. Monitoring the team progress by making use of engineering science is conducive for the Multinational Corporation (MNC) today and even tomorrow. This is because it allows the team to be consistently kept a check upon from a political, economic and technological stance. It has helped image up the different dimensions of the business of a MNC by making use of varied pointers which assist in understanding the strengths and opportunities that lie within the team and which shall shape the quandaries of the shaping in the long run (Briggs, 2011). This has been the case within most of the renowned businesses and MNCs of today and it will continue to be like this in the approach shot times as well. Monitoring the team progress is always a Herculean task but then again it has to start off from somewhere in entirety. When team progress is monitored using technology, this means that many a tasks are being handled properly. This also implies that the team progress knows where it is being headed, i.e. in the right direction. What is even more interesting to note is that the people responsible for making sure that the team progress remains supreme are the ones who remain answerable for all these tasks in the first place. The environment within the MNCs of today is such that there is a lot of competition for giving in the best possible efforts and hence the reason that team progress remains a much desired proposition. Also what is most significant under such domains is how well the team progress has been measured (Martins, 2011). If this team progress is understood to be the best possible yardstick for finding out future possibilities, then it would mean that the organization is doing something worthwhile and indeed the monitoring is being carried out in the most apt manner possible. Seldom are a few issues cropping u p which abolish the basis of finding out the team progress and these need to be checked upon time and again. There is a dire need to understand the fundamental principle behind evaluating and monitoring the team progress because it is the force upon which the sanity of the organizations rest upon. In essence, monitoring the team progress is fundamental towards understanding the dynamics of the MNCs.